Did you know
|
|
Strategy
• Assuming an annual return of 7% per year, if you invest $10,000 per year from age 30 to age 40 ($100,000 invested), you would have $809,844 at age 65. If you invest $10,000 per year from 40 years old to 65 years old ($250,000 invested), you would have $690,564 at 65 years old. This is 15% less!
• Diversification and rebalancing are key:
if you have two investments, one with annual returns of 0%, 5% and 15% (20.8% over 3 years) and the second one with annual returns of 30%, -30%, and 30% (18.3% over 3 years), an annual 60%/40% combination of the two investments will have a 3-year return of 23.3%, better than each of the two investments standing alone
• From 1929 to 1949 (20 years) and from 1968 to 2009 (41 years), $1 invested in bonds was a better investment than in stocks
Past Market Performance
• Between 1983 and 2003, the US stock market return was 13% but the average investor had a 7.9% return which was 5.1% less. The average equity fund return was 10.3%. This highlights why you need a good financial advisor
• $1 invested in small cap stocks in 1926 would have become $9,550 in 2008 vs. $2,045 in large caps, $99 in bonds, $41 in gold and $20 left in cash
• $1 invested in French bonds in 1900 would have become $0.8 in 2008 vs. $30 in French Equities (adjusted for inflation)
• The last two occurences US large-cap stocks total return was negative over a 10-year period was in 1938 and 2008
• From 1985 to 2008, the probability of a negative return for the S&P 500 over any 1-year period was 20%
|
|
Economy
• From 1967 to 1984, the average inflation rate was close to 7% (vs. close to 3% average for the past 100 years)
• US unemployment rate in 1895 was approximately 18% and 25% in the 1930’s (vs. 10% expected peak in 2009-2010). In June 2009, the U-6 unemployment rate (headline unemployed around 9.4% plus marginally employed) is above 15%
• The top marginal US tax rate was 93% in the 1950’s - 1960’s. It was 70% in the 1970’s, 50% in early 1980’s and 35% from 2003 to 2009
• The US savings rate was between 8% and 12% from 1960 to 1980. It was below 2% in 2007
• In 2007, the median household income was around $50,000. The top 10% had income above $140,000
• In 2007, the median household net worth was around $120,000. The top 10% had a net worth above $900,000
• The 2008-2009 recession is very different from the Great Depression. During 1929-1933, the real GDP contraction was -29% (vs. -4% in 2009), unemployment rate was 25% (vs. 10% in 2009), consumer prices went down 25% (vs. down 2.8% in 2008), money supply was down 33% (vs. up 12% in 2009) and the budget deficit was 2.6% vs. 10.1%
Go back
|